Each of the essays have an intro. In the essay about pro stem cells, their intro is all about the decision to end many restrictions on embryonic stem cell research that has removed a key barrier to research and discovery. The body paragraphs in the pro stem cells essay are about how scientists are trying to prove what they can do to end the many restrictions on embryonic stem cell research that has removed a key barrier to research and discovery, as mentioned in their intro. The pro stem cells essay's conclusion summarizes what was talked about in the body paragraphs and tells everyone that it's time to get started from the eight years that we've lost and finally realize the potential of stem cells as the therapeutic tool they all hope they will be. In the essay that is anti stem cells, their intro is about the embryonic stem cells and what they do in our body and what they are for. In the body paragraphs, they talk about the issue of who or what, the deliberate misuse of terminology in defining stem cells, ESCR that is related to human cloning, the current status of ESCR in the U.S. is unsettled at best, the existence of a law that could apply to ESCR, etc. In their conclusion paragraph, they summarize what was said and give their final statement and try to prove their point. They believe that more money should be invested in adult stem cell research and the macabre research associated with ESCR should be abandoned entirely.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview Archives
June 2016
Categories |